Talent Practice
Assessments that reveal
real potential
Traditional assessments measure what people say about themselves. Talentprint measures what raters consistently observe - using forced-ranking methodology that eliminates the inflation bias that makes most 360° feedback useless.
The challenge
What's wrong with most talent assessments
Most organisations recognise the problem but struggle to close the gap between intent and execution. The issues are predictable - and solvable.
How we work
The Peopletree assessment approach
Forced-ranking methodology
Raters select which attributes best and least describe the individual - eliminating the rating inflation that plagues scale-based tools.
Talent Genome framework
18 clusters and 60 competencies built on peer-reviewed research. The same framework used across assessment, development, and succession.
Multi-rater 360° feedback
Self, manager, peer, and direct report perspectives - aggregated and weighted to surface the most reliable signal.
Behavioural profile output
Each individual receives a Talent Discovery Report - a clear, actionable profile of relative strengths and development priorities.
Group-level analytics
Aggregate results across teams, functions, or the whole organisation to identify capability gaps at scale.
Connected to action
Assessment results feed directly into development plans, succession decisions, and coaching conversations - not just reports.
What you get
Measurable outcomes, not just activity
Every engagement is scoped against specific business outcomes. We track progress against them - and so should you.
Technology
Powered by the right tools
What “Who” questions does Talent Assessment answer?
Explore the 6 key “Who” questions this practice is designed to answer.
See what forced-ranking assessment reveals
Request a demo or pilot. We'll run a sample assessment and show you what the output looks like - and how it compares to what you're using today.